John's banters with .. ~
NEWEST John banters with a Republican Sodahead Nazi
Nuker says... You and your kind disgust me. It's people like you who make people
like me ashamed to be American. God forbid one of you psychos ever gets into a political
office in this or any country. We would be invaded by the Canadians for Christ's
sake!
~ Wyld says... There is no doubt of your creativity
and verbal charisma, however,I take issue with the anonymity of your cause.
With an issue is of great import, i.e. presidency, it is laughable that you
would take that stance.
Ms. Smith says "I am
fighting HARD to legalize Hemp as a re-newable energy source & people like you
make it hard for me to do so. So light up your joint but blow the smoke up your a**"
Ed takes on John the Stock
Market issues and some MacroEconomics
An angry Mother says
"The future of everyone will be much better if you fucking drug addicts
disappear;"
~ Wm says... I appreciate the candor and bravery in your views.
Although I do believe in your suppositions, I do not agree with your viewpoint, or
it's summation. I understand that politicians create politics, not solutions,
. The implied acceptance of drugs (including any and every mind or mood altering
substance ingested for recreational purposes) in our society is just another method
of the "Dumbing Down of America". At a time when we should be sharpening
our wits, we are numbing the few faculties of ours that work.
~
Al Says...You should not encourage people to vote or participate in any
way in the "group think" of participatory democracy. All means of group
decision making can be summed up by the analogy "Democracy is two wolves and
one sheep voting on what to have for dinner."
~ Lbk says...
The viewpoints and attitudes of the sort found at your website are really the cause
of most of the confusion and lack of self control exhibited by many in our nation
today...
~ JP says... Campaign spending limits are an unconstitutional
restriction of free speech. Of course, this wouldn't be a problem if the Supreme
Court would declare 80% of government spending unconstitutional.
